Porsche Cayman (987C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed267 km/h166 mph
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.3 L/100 km14.4 mpg US17.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score77/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Most powerful298 hp222 kW
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 298hp222kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 411Nm303lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 86.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s | 22.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 582km362mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,386cc207cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,341mm171in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 22.7 s |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 has 3 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 6.2 s |
Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 582 km 362 mi |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.1 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 298 hp 222 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 582 km 362 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) 4.2 V8
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 71 Nm more
- Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























