Porsche Cayman (987C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4vsBMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 1 Series Coupe (E82)
135i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Fastest top speed267 km/h166 mph
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best estimated range582 km362 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.3L/100 km14.4mpg US17.3mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 582km362mi Calculated | 576km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,386cc207cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,341mm171in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,748mm69in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,408mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,497mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 262g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
- BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6,250 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i has 11 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 and BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 6.1 s |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i and Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 582 km 362 mi |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 576 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 295 hp 220 kW | 6.1 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4 | BMW1 Series Coupe (E82)135i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 582 km 362 mi | 576 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 262 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4 | BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) S 3.4
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 1 Series Coupe (E82) 135i
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























