Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5vsPorsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions184 g/km
- Best estimated range790 km491 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score85/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 67.4s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 790km491mi Calculated | 711km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,284mm51in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 334L | 425L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 184g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 1,900-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 183 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 has 25 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 4.6 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 790 km 491 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 790 km 491 mi | 711 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 184 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 | Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























