Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4vsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Fastest top speed274 km/h170 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range663 km412 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,180kg2,601lb |
| Gross weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | - |
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 271 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 663km412mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 230g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 7,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V has 15 hp more than Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 5.3 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 663 km 412 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.3 s | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 663 km 412 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 230 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























