AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSIvsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range632 km392 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,180kg2,601lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 632km392mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-6,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.6 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 112 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW |
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI has 15 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 4.7 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 632 km 392 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)2.5 TFSI | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 632 km 392 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























