Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) · Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8vsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Best estimated range583 km362 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score73/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,180kg2,601lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 340Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,103mm162in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,788mm70in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,549mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 208L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 has 35 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 4.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 583 km 362 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 208 L 7.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8 | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) Facelift 2008 AMG SLK 55 V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Is 320 kg lighter
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























