Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (997)
GT2 3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight396 hp/t296 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk128 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best estimated range720 km447 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 650hp485kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 53.0s99% target: 326 km/h / 202 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.9s | 10.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 18.8L/100 km12.5mpg US15.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 396hp/t296kW/t180hp/1000 lb Calculated | 368hp/t274kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 488Nm/t326lb-ft/ton Calculated | 472Nm/t316lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 720km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,745cc229cu in | 3,600cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,469mm176in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,350mm93in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 128L | 105L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,750 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,200-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.9 s | 10.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 50.5 s | 43.8 s |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 530 hp 395 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 has 120 hp more than Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6 and Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8: 120 hp (89 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 329 km/h 204 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 2.7 s |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 604 km 375 mi |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 720 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 2.7 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.7 s | 329 km/h 204 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 650 hp 485 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 720 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 128 L 4.5 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 120 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























