Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Dakar (992)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight396 hp/t296 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.1 L/100 km15.6 mpg US18.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range638 km396 mi
- Largest trunk132 L
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 650hp485kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 41.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.9s | 12.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 396hp/t296kW/t180hp/1000 lb Calculated | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 488Nm/t326lb-ft/ton Calculated | 355Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 638km396mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,745cc229cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,530mm178in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,338mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 128L | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,750 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,300-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.9 s | 12.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 50.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.4 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 has 170 hp more than Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8: 170 hp (127 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 2.7 s |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 604 km 375 mi |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 638 km 396 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 2.7 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 650 hp 485 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 638 km 396 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 128 L 4.5 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 170 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 75 km/h (47 mph) higher top speed
- Has 97 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























