Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (991)
Turbo 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8
- Most powerful520 hp388 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range687 km427 mi
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Best power-to-weight355 hp/t265 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 520hp388kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 1,782kg3,929lb | 2,045kg4,508lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.9s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 51.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s | 10.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 355hp/t265kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated | 312hp/t233kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 516km321mi Calculated | 687km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,800cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,506mm177in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,292mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,457mm97in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 275L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 231g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 8,400 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 10.0 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 520 hp 388 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 has 10 hp more than Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 3.4 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 3.5 s |
Although Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 has more power, Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 and Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 312 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 516 km 321 mi |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 687 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.4 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.5 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 312 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 520 hp 388 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 516 km 321 mi | 687 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 231 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 312 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 43 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 171 km (106 mi) more estimated range
- Has 143 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























