Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) · Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) · Facelift 2024
Carrera GTS 3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful520 hp388 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight312 hp/t233 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score80/100
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520hp388kW | 485hp362kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 51.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.0s Calculated | 10.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t233kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | 340Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 687km427mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,591cc219cu in |
| Length | 4,506mm177in | 4,553mm179in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,292mm51in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 275L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 135L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 231g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.0 s | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 212 km/h 132 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 520 hp 388 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 485 hp 362 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 has 35 hp more than Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 3.5 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 3.1 s |
Although Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 has more power, Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 312 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.5 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 485 hp 362 kW | 3.1 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | 312 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp 388 kW | 485 hp 362 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 687 km 427 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 231 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 135 L 4.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8 | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Turbo 3.8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























