Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0vsPorsche 911 (996) · Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (996) · Facelift 2001
GT2 3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Best power-to-weight355 hp/t265 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.3 L/100 km13.6 mpg US16.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk132 L
- Best economy score74/100
Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range690 km429 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 483hp360kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 640Nm472lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,782kg3,929lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.9s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 58.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 355hp/t265kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated | 340hp/t254kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 451Nm/t302lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 516km321mi Calculated | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,600cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,450mm175in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,275mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,457mm97in | 2,355mm93in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 132L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 89L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 309g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 8,400 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 5,700 rpm | 3,500-4,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 483 hp 360 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 has 27 hp more than Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6 and Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 3.4 s |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 and Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 and Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 340 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 516 km 321 mi |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 690 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.4 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 483 hp 360 kW | 4.1 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | 340 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)GT3 4.0 | Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001GT2 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 483 hp 360 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 516 km 321 mi | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 309 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 355 hp/t 265 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 340 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0 | Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 4.0
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 GT2 3.6
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























