Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8vsPorsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (992)
Turbo S 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range604 km375 mi
- Largest trunk128 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph
- Most powerful700 hp522 kW
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight476 hp/t355 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 700hp522kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.2s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated | 66.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.3s | 8.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 2.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 476hp/t355kW/t216hp/1000 lb Calculated | 396hp/t296kW/t180hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 510Nm/t341lb-ft/ton Calculated | 488Nm/t326lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | 604km375mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,745cc229cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,453mm97in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,583mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,600mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 115L | 128L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | 269g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 7,000 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,750 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.3 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 33.3 s | 50.5 s |
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 700 hp 522 kW |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8 has 50 hp more than Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 2.8 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 2.7 s |
Although Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8 has more power, Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 476 hp/t 355 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 542 km 337 mi |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 604 km 375 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 700 hp 522 kW | 2.8 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 2.7 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 476 hp/t 355 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)Turbo S 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 700 hp 522 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | 604 km 375 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 269 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | 128 L 4.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 476 hp/t 355 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 396 hp/t 296 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8
- Has 50 hp more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 80 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























