Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8vsPorsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (991)
Turbo S 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Best estimated range701 km436 mi
- Largest trunk375 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph
- Most powerful700 hp522 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight476 hp/t355 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 700hp522kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.2s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated | 44.5s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 476hp/t355kW/t216hp/1000 lb Calculated | 349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 510Nm/t341lb-ft/ton Calculated | 436Nm/t292lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | 701km436mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,800cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,506mm177in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,453mm97in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 115L | 375L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 269g/km | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 7,000 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,500-6,750 rpm | 2,100-4,250 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 33.3 s | - |
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 9.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 700 hp 522 kW |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8 has 140 hp more than Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: 140 hp (104 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 2.8 s |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 3.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8 and Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 476 hp/t 355 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 542 km 337 mi |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 701 km 436 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 700 hp 522 kW | 2.8 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | 476 hp/t 355 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 700 hp 522 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 318 km/h 198 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | 701 km 436 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 269 g/km | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | 375 L 13.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 476 hp/t 355 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8 | Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) GT2 RS 3.8
- Has 140 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 127 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 911 (991) Turbo S 3.8
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
- Emits 42 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























