Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0vsPorsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Boxster (982)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions180 g/km
- Best estimated range684 km425 mi
- Largest trunk150 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,365kg3,009lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 684km425mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 1,988cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,276mm50in | 1,281mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 150L |
| Max trunk volume | 275L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 180g/km | 180g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7,500 rpm | 2,150-4,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,150-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 4.7 s |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 and Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 684 km 425 mi |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 684 km 425 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 180 g/km | 180 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 | Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) 2.0
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























