Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight217 hp/t162 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions180 g/km
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range778 km483 mi
- Largest trunk299 L
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 19.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 684km425mi Calculated | 778km483mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,276mm50in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,647mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 299L |
| Max trunk volume | 275L | 509L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 180g/km | 184g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7,500 rpm | 2,150-4,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 19.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 4.7 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 684 km 425 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 778 km 483 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20202.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 684 km 425 mi | 778 km 483 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 180 g/km | 184 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 299 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 94 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Has 149 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























