Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0vsPorsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions180 g/km
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Most powerful325 hp242 kW
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,370kg3,020lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 684km425mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,988cc121cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,276mm50in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 150L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 275L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 180g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7,500 rpm | 2,150-4,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 281 km/h 175 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 has 25 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 281 km/h 175 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 4.9 s |
Although Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 has more power, Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 684 km 425 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 281 km/h 175 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0 | PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 281 km/h 175 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 684 km 425 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 180 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 | Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 275 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























