Xiaomi SU7
Car comparison
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWhvsPolestar 5 112 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPolestar 5
112 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful1,548 hp1,154 kW
- Highest torque1,770 Nm1,305 lb-ft
- Lightest2,360 kg5,203 lb
- Best power-to-weight656 hp/t489 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk454 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,548hp1,154kW | 748hp558kW |
| Torque | 1,770Nm1,305lb-ft | 812Nm599lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Gross weight | 2,810kg6,195lb | - |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 34.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.9s | 11.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 9.1s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 656hp/t489kW/t298hp/1000 lb Calculated | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 750Nm/t502lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,115mm201in | 5,087mm200in |
| Width | 1,970mm78in | 2,015mm79in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 3,054mm120in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,716mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 454L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,128L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.9 s | 11.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 21.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.9 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.6 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.1 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 248 km/h 154 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW |
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh has 800 hp more than Polestar 5 112 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh: 800 hp (597 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,770 Nm 1,305 lb-ft |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 2.0 s |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 1.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 656 hp/t 489 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW | 2.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | Polestar5112 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW | 748 hp 558 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,770 Nm 1,305 lb-ft | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 656 hp/t 489 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh
- Has 800 hp more
- Has 958 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 85 km/h (53 mph) higher top speed
- Has 357 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 89 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Polestar 5 112 kWh
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























