Xiaomi SU7
Car comparison
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWhvsBentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Flying Spur III
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful1,548 hp1,154 kW
- Highest torque1,770 Nm1,305 lb-ft
- Lightest2,360 kg5,203 lb
- Best power-to-weight656 hp/t489 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk454 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
- Best economy score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,548hp1,154kW | 635hp474kW |
| Torque | 1,770Nm1,305lb-ft | 900Nm664lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,437kg5,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,810kg6,195lb | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 42.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 50.4s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.9s | 9.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.1s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 656hp/t489kW/t298hp/1000 lb Calculated | 261hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 750Nm/t502lb-ft/ton Calculated | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 677km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 5,950cc363cu in |
| Length | 5,115mm201in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,970mm78in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 3,194mm126in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 454L | 420L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.9 s | 9.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 21.1 s | 37.0 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 333 km/h 207 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.9 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.6 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.1 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 248 km/h 154 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 635 hp 474 kW |
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh has 913 hp more than Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh: 913 hp (681 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,770 Nm 1,305 lb-ft |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 2,437 kg 5,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 333 km/h 207 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 2.0 s |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh and Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12: 1.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 656 hp/t 489 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 261 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW | 2.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.8 s | 333 km/h 207 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW | 635 hp 474 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,770 Nm 1,305 lb-ft | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 333 km/h 207 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | 2,437 kg 5,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 677 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 656 hp/t 489 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 261 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,491 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh
- Has 913 hp more
- Has 870 Nm more
- Is 77 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 395 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























