Xiaomi SU7
Car comparison
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWhvsAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful1,548 hp1,154 kW
- Highest torque1,770 Nm1,305 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight656 hp/t489 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score93/100
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,548hp1,154kW | 520hp388kW |
| Torque | 1,770Nm1,305lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,810kg6,195lb | - |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 42.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 39.4s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.0s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.9s | 9.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 1.9s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.1s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 656hp/t489kW/t298hp/1000 lb Calculated | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 750Nm/t502lb-ft/ton Calculated | 361Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,891cc176cu in |
| Length | 5,115mm201in | 4,639mm183in |
| Width | 1,970mm78in | 1,874mm74in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,433mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,553mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,649mm65in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 454L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 1.9 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.9 s | 9.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 21.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 3.9 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 5.9 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.6 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.1 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 248 km/h 154 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 520 hp 388 kW |
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh has 1,028 hp more than Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo and Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh: 1,028 hp (767 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,770 Nm 1,305 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 308 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 2.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo: 1.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 656 hp/t 489 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW | 2.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.9 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XiaomiSU7Ultra 93.7 kWh | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,548 hp 1,154 kW | 520 hp 388 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,770 Nm 1,305 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.0 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 454 L 16.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 656 hp/t 489 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra 93.7 kWh
- Has 1,028 hp more
- Has 1,170 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
- Has 343 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
- Is 700 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























