Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) · Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-TurbovsTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
- Fastest top speed308 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful520 hp388 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight313 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score80/100
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520hp388kW | 513hp383kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.4s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 27.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s Calculated | 9.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 361Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,891cc176cu in | - |
| Length | 4,639mm183in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,553mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 649L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 9.4 s |
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 520 hp 388 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW |
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo has 7 hp more than Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 3.9 s |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 3.3 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo has more power, Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh and Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.9 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW | 3.3 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Performance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp 388 kW | 513 hp 383 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 308 km/h 191 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 649 L 22.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) Facelift 2022 Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 268 kg lighter
- Has 47 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























