Car comparison

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12vsBentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Flying Spur III

6.0 W12

635 hp5950 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2019-2024
VS

Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016

Speed 6.75 V8

537 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    333 km/h
    207 mph
  • Most powerful
    635 hp
    474 kW
  • Lightest
    2,437 kg
    5,373 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    261 hp/t
    194 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.3 L/100 km
    17.7 mpg US
    21.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.6 L/100 km
    12.6 mpg US
    15.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    677 km
    420 mi
  • Best overall score
    83/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
635hp474kW
537hp400kW
Torque
900Nm664lb-ft
1,100Nm811lb-ft
Curb weight
2,437kg5,373lb
2,685kg5,919lb
Gross weight
3,000kg6,614lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
50.4s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph
Calculated
60.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
9.9s
Calculated
13.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
12.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
261hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb
Calculated
200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton
Calculated
410Nm/t274lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
677km420mi
Calculated
658km409mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,950cc363cu in
6,752cc412cu in
Length
5,316mm209in
5,575mm219in
Width
1,987mm78in
-
Height
1,484mm58in
1,521mm60in
Wheelbase
3,194mm126in
3,266mm129in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
420L
443L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
90L
96L
CO2 emissions-
342g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W125,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.9 s
13.5 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
37.0 s
-
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
12.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
217 km/h
135 mph
193 km/h
120 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
635 hp
474 kW
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
537 hp
400 kW

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 has 98 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 and Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12: 98 hp (73 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
2,437 kg
5,373 lb
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
2,685 kg
5,919 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
333 km/h
207 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W123.8 s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V84.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 and Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
261 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
677 km
420 mi
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
635 hp
474 kW
3.8 s
333 km/h
207 mph
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
537 hp
400 kW
4.9 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
3.8 s
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12
261 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8
Power
635 hp
474 kW
537 hp
400 kW
Torque
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
1,100 Nm
811 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.9 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
2,437 kg
5,373 lb
2,685 kg
5,919 lb
Fuel consumption
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,575 mm
219.5 in
Height
1,521 mm
59.9 in
Range score
677 km
420 mi
658 km
409 mi
CO2 score
-
342 g/km
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
443 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
261 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
200 hp/t
149 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12Bentley Mulsanne II Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8
Consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.28 LC100 km25.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.46 LC100 mi41.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,491 LC/year3,833 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12

  • Has 98 hp more
  • Is 248 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12
Bentley Mulsanne II Speed 6.75 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 W12
S 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 2015S 6.0 W12
Speed 6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
6.0 W12
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
Speed 6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
6.0 W12
AMG E 63 S
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
6.0 W12
CS 4.4 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8
6.0 W12
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
Speed 6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
6.0 W12
Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)Facelift 2016Trofeo 3.8 V8 GDI
Speed 6.75 V8
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
6.0 W12
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
BentleyFlying Spur III6.0 W12vsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Speed 6.75 V8
S 600 V12
VS
BentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 2016Speed 6.75 V8vsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (X222)S 600 V12
Bentley Flying Spur III 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Mulsanne II · Facelift 2016 Speed 6.75 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster