Car comparison

Polestar 4 102 kWhvsXPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Polestar 4

102 kWh

544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-present
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Polestar 4 102 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    544 hp
    406 kW
  • Highest torque
    686 Nm
    506 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100

XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh

  • Lightest
    2,095 kg
    4,619 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    232 hp/t
    173 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    571 L
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPolestar4102 kWhXPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
Power
544hp406kW
487hp363kW
Torque
686Nm506lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
2,351kg5,183lb
2,095kg4,619lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
202 km/h126 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
41.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
39.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
21.5s
Calculated
20.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
231hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb
Calculated
232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,839mm191in
4,753mm187in
Width
2,139mm84in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,544mm61in
1,650mm65in
Wheelbase
2,999mm118in
2,890mm114in
Front track-
1,635mm64in
Rear track-
1,650mm65in
Ground clearance
166mm7in
-
Trunk volume
500L
571L
Max trunk volume
1,536L
1,374L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPolestar4102 kWhXPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.5 s
20.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
202 km/h126 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
174 km/h
108 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
544 hp
406 kW
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Polestar 4 102 kWh has 57 hp more than XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 57 hp (43 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
686 Nm
506 lb-ft
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
2,351 kg
5,183 lb
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
2,095 kg
4,619 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
202 km/h126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh3.8 s
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh3.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 4 102 kWh and XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
231 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Polestar4102 kWh
544 hp
406 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
202 km/h126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Polestar4102 kWh
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,839 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,544 mm
60.8 in
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
202 km/h126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
571 L
20.2 cu ft
Length
4,753 mm
187.1 in
Height
1,650 mm
65.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePolestar4102 kWhXPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWh
Power
544 hp
406 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
686 Nm
506 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
202 km/h126 mph
Lightness
2,351 kg
5,183 lb
2,095 kg
4,619 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,839 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,544 mm
60.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
571 L
20.2 cu ft
Length
4,753 mm
187.1 in
Height
1,650 mm
65.0 in
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
571 L
20.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
231 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
232 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Polestar 4 102 kWh

  • Has 57 hp more
  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh

  • Is 256 kg lighter
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 71 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 4 102 kWh
XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

102 kWh
M50 83.9 kWh
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
Performance 87.5 kWh
GT 98.7 kWh
VS
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
102 kWh
90 kWh
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
Performance 87.5 kWh
3.0
VS
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
Performance 87.5 kWh
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
102 kWh
AMG GLE 63 V8
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 V8
Performance 87.5 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
102 kWh
X H550 2.0L
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsLotusEletreX H550 2.0L
Performance 87.5 kWh
AMG CLE 53
VS
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
102 kWh
M850i V8
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
Performance 87.5 kWh
3.0
VS
XPENGG6Performance 87.5 kWhvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
102 kWh
M850i
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
Polestar 4 102 kWh vs XPENG G6 Performance 87.5 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster