Polestar 4
102 kWh
544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-present
Car comparison
Polestar 4 102 kWhvsXPENG G6 · Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
XPENG G6 · Facelift 2025
Performance 80.8 kWh
487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2026-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque686 Nm506 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight231 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score0/100
XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh
- Lightest2,220 kg4,894 lb
- Largest trunk571 L
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar4102 kWh | XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544hp406kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 686Nm506lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,351kg5,183lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,690kg5,930lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 42.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 231hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,839mm191in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 2,139mm84in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,544mm61in | 1,650mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,999mm118in | 2,890mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 166mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 571L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,536L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar4102 kWh | XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Polestar 4 102 kWh has 57 hp more than XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 2,220 kg 4,894 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 3.8 s |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 4 102 kWh and XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar4102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar4102 kWh | XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp 406 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 686 Nm 506 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,351 kg 5,183 lb | 2,220 kg 4,894 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 571 L 20.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 231 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 4 102 kWh
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 26 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh
- Is 131 kg lighter
- Has 71 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 4 102 kWh
XPENG G6 Performance 80.8 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Polestar4102 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsLotusEletreX H550 2.0L
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
Polestar4102 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 V8
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 53
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2026AMG GLE 53
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsMaseratiGranTurismo IIFacelift 20263.0 V6
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8