BMW M2 (G87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0vsXPENG G6 · Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG G6 · Facelift 2025
Performance 80.8 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,790 kg3,946 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score79/100
XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Largest trunk571 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,690kg5,930lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 42.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 500km311mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,650mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,747mm108in | 2,890mm114in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 571L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh has 7 hp more than BMW M2 (G87) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 2,220 kg 4,894 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 3.7 s |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 4.1 s |
Although XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh has more power, BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 and XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 (G87)3.0 | XPENGG6Facelift 2025Performance 80.8 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 202 km/h126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 2,220 kg 4,894 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 500 km 311 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 571 L 20.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 (G87) 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 (G87) 3.0
- Is 430 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
XPENG G6 Facelift 2025 Performance 80.8 kWh
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 181 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























