Peugeot 607
Car comparison
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24VvsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.5T 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Largest trunk481 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 816km507mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,877mm192in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,539mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 481L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 3 hp more than Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 816 km 507 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 481 L 17.0 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























