Roewe i6
Car comparison
Roewe i6 1.5 TvsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 408 II
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful169 hp126 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk467 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Best estimated range898 km558 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Roewei61.5 T | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 169hp126kW | 167hp125kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.1s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 763km474mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,490cc91cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,835mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 467L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Roewei61.5 T | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.1 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW |
Roewe i6 1.5 T has 2 hp more than Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 8.2 s |
Although Roewe i6 1.5 T has more power, Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 763 km 474 mi |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Roewe i6 1.5 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Roewei61.5 T | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 169 hp 126 kW | 167 hp 125 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 763 km 474 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Roewe i6 1.5 T | Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























