Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsRoewe i6 1.5 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRoewe i6
1.5 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,341 km834 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful169 hp126 kW
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | Roewei61.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 169hp126kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 33.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,341km834mi Calculated | 763km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,490cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 467L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | Roewei61.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 33.1 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
Roewe i6 1.5 T has 6 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Roewe i6 1.5 T and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| Roewei61.5 T | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,341 km 834 mi |
| Roewei61.5 T | 763 km 474 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Roewei61.5 T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| Roewei61.5 T | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | Roewei61.5 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 169 hp 126 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,341 km 834 mi | 763 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Roewe i6 1.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 579 km (360 mi) more estimated range
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























