AUDI A3 Sedan (8V)
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultravsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 408 II
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score94/100
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Most powerful167 hp125 kW
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 167hp125kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,064km661mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,456mm175in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 880L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW |
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP has 17 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 8.2 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 8.2 s |
Although Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP has more power, AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 1,064 km 661 mi |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 167 hp 125 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,064 km 661 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra | Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























