Peugeot 406 (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.5T 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.1s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,600mm181in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,562mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,482mm58in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,106L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.1 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 3 hp more than Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 8.1 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























