Car comparison

Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6vsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 406 (PHASE II)

3.0 V6

207 hp2946 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2000-2004
VS

Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003

2.5T 20V

210 hp2521 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    440 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    0/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
Power
207hp154kW
210hp157kW
Torque
285Nm210lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,455kg3,208lb
1,530kg3,373lb
Gross weight
1,995kg4,398lb
2,080kg4,586lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
66.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
28.1s
Calculated
26.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption city
13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
2,521cc154cu in
Length
4,600mm181in
4,822mm190in
Width
1,765mm69in
1,832mm72in
Height
1,404mm55in
1,434mm56in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,562mm61in
Rear track
1,482mm58in
1,560mm61in
Trunk volume
430L
440L
Max trunk volume-
1,106L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V66,000 rpm3,750 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V5,000 rpm1,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.1 s
26.4 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
210 hp
157 kW

Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V has 3 hp more than Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
1,530 kg
3,373 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
240 km/h
149 mph
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V68.1 s
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V7.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
207 hp
154 kW
8.1 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
210 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,600 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V
Power
207 hp
154 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
1,530 kg
3,373 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,600 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6

  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 35 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Volvo S80 2.5T 20V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 vs Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V - car comparison - FastVsFaster