Renault Megane III Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCevsPeugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 207 SW
1.6 RC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,353 kg2,983 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 174hp130kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,391kg3,067lb | 1,353kg2,983lb |
| Gross weight | 1,884kg4,154lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,559mm179in | 4,156mm164in |
| Width | 1,766mm70in | 1,748mm69in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,527mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,703mm106in | 2,540mm100in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,467mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 524L | 337L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,595L | 1,258L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW |
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe has 6 hp more than Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 8.0 s |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.6 s |
Although Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe has more power, Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC and Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 174 hp 130 kW | 7.6 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe | Peugeot207 SW1.6 RC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 174 hp 130 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,391 kg 3,067 lb | 1,353 kg 2,983 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | 337 L 11.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe | Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III Grandtour GT 2.0 TCe
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 104 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 187 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Peugeot 207 SW 1.6 RC
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























