Peugeot 207
Car comparison
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6vsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful174 hp130 kW
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot207RC 1.6 | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 174hp130kW | 173hp129kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 2,042kg4,502lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 98.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km432mi Calculated | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,030mm159in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,472mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,540mm100in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,475mm58in | - |
| Rear track | 1,468mm58in | - |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 923L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 207 RC 1.6: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot207RC 1.6 | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 174 hp 130 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 173 hp 129 kW |
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 has 1 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Peugeot 207 RC 1.6: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 7.1 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Peugeot 207 RC 1.6: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 694 km 432 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,015 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 174 hp 130 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 173 hp 129 kW | 8.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot207RC 1.6 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot207RC 1.6 | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 174 hp 130 kW | 173 hp 129 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 432 mi | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 207 RC 1.6 | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 207 RC 1.6
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 317 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 140 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 321 km (199 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























