Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V TurbovsVolvo S40 II 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Lowest city consumption15.1 L/100 km15.6 mpg US18.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,611mm182in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | 500L | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 241g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has 10 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 and Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 7.7 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 7.5 s |
Although Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has more power, Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 and Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 241 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 96 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























