Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V TurbovsNissan Teana 3.5 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Teana
3.5 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 648km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,611mm182in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has 15 hp more than Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 7.7 s |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 7.9 s |
Although Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has more power, Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 648 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Is 94 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























