Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Opel Vectra C · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V TurbovsVolkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta V
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,611mm182in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 527L |
| Max trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
Although Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has more power, Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelVectra CFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Vectra C Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























