Opel Insignia Sedan (A)
Car comparison
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 TurbovsSeat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,843kg4,063lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,365kg5,214lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.7s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 603km375mi Calculated | 1,014km630mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,830mm190in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,858mm73in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,737mm108in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,010L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 1,900-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.7 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo has 49 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI and Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 603 km 375 mi |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)2.8 V6 Turbo | SeatExeo2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 603 km 375 mi | 1,014 km 630 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo | Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) 2.8 V6 Turbo
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
- Is 338 kg lighter
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 411 km (255 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























