Car comparison

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VvsOpel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II)

3.0i V6 24V

254 hp2946 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2005
VS

Opel Astra H

2.0i 16V Turbo

240 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,385 kg
    3,053 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    565 km
    351 mi
  • Largest trunk
    380 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VOpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
Power
254hp189kW
240hp179kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,400kg3,086lb
1,385kg3,053lb
Gross weight
1,610kg3,549lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
74.1s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
21.3s
Calculated
24.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
513km319mi
Calculated
565km351mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
3,841mm151in
4,249mm167in
Width
1,830mm72in
1,753mm69in
Height
1,351mm53in
1,467mm58in
Wheelbase
2,532mm100in
2,614mm103in
Front track
1,518mm60in
1,488mm59in
Rear track
1,470mm58in
1,488mm59in
Ground clearance-
160mm6in
Trunk volume
45L
380L
Max trunk volume
67L
1,330L
Doors
2
5
Seats
2
5
Fuel tank
61L
52L
CO2 emissions
285g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VOpel Astra H 2.0i 16V TurboPowerTorque
  • Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V7,150 rpm4,650 rpm7,400 rpm
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo5,600 rpm-5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VOpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.3 s
24.2 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
167 km/h
104 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
254 hp
189 kW
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
240 hp
179 kW

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V has 14 hp more than Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
1,385 kg
3,053 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
244 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V5.8 s
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo6.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V and Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
513 km
319 mi
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
565 km
351 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
254 hp
189 kW
5.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
6.4 s
244 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
45 L
1.6 cu ft
Length
3,841 mm
151.2 in
Height
1,351 mm
53.2 in
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,249 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,467 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
5.8 s
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VOpelAstra H2.0i 16V Turbo
Power
254 hp
189 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.4 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,400 kg
3,086 lb
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
45 L
1.6 cu ft
Length
3,841 mm
151.2 in
Height
1,351 mm
53.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,249 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,467 mm
57.8 in
Range score
513 km
319 mi
565 km
351 mi
CO2 score
285 g/km
-
Trunk score
45 L
1.6 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24VOpel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 335 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V
Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0i V6 24V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0i 16V Turbo
3.2 V6
VS
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V TurbovsAlfa Romeo147 GTA3.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
2.0i 16V Turbo
3.2 V6
VS
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V TurbovsAUDIA3 (8P)3.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
2.0i 16V Turbo
3.2i V6 24V
VS
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V TurbovsAUDIA3 Sportback (8PA)3.2i V6 24V
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0i 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V TurbovsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0i 16V Turbo
Cupra 2.0 TFSI
VS
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V TurbovsSeatLeon II (1P)Cupra 2.0 TFSI
3.0i V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0i 16V Turbo
3.2 V6
VS
OpelAstra H2.0i 16V TurbovsAUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20053.2 V6
3.0i V6 24V
3.0 V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE II) 3.0i V6 24V vs Opel Astra H 2.0i 16V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster