Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003
Car comparison
Volvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.5T 20VvsNissan Teana 3.5 i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Teana
3.5 i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk476 L
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 66.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 648km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,845mm191in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V: Power / Torque
- Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has 35 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 7.7 s |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 7.9 s |
Although Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 has more power, Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V and Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanTeana3.5 i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.5T 20V | NissanTeana3.5 i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 648 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.5T 20V
- Is 59 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Teana 3.5 i V6
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























