Volkswagen Tiguan I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSIvsNissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Murano II (Z51)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,662 kg3,664 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Most powerful256 hp191 kW
- Highest torque334 Nm246 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range774 km481 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 334Nm246lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,662kg3,664lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,257kg4,976lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 91.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 41.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 719km447mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,427mm174in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,809mm71in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,604mm103in | 2,825mm111in |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 41.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW |
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 has 56 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 8.0 s |
Although Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 719 km 447 mi |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI | NissanMurano II (Z51)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,662 kg 3,664 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 719 km 447 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI | Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
- Is 128 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan Murano II (Z51) 3.5
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 54 Nm more
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























