Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 3vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 2vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 1vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6 (Stage 3)

795 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6 (Stage 2)

689 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6 (Stage 1)

625 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

530 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    368 km/h
    229 mph
  • Most powerful
    795 hp
    593 kW
  • Highest torque
    949 Nm
    700 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    457 hp/t
    341 kW/t
    2.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.3 L/100 km
    13.6 mpg US
    16.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    617 km
    383 mi
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
Power
795hp593kW+265 hp
689hp514kW+159 hp
625hp466kW+95 hp
530hp395kW
Torque
949Nm700lb-ft+337 Nm
826Nm609lb-ft+214 Nm
747Nm551lb-ft+135 Nm
612Nm451lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
+53 km/h
353 km/h
219 mph
+38 km/h
344 km/h
214 mph
+29 km/h
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
34.9s99% target: 364 km/h / 226 mph-10.5 s
Calculated
39.2s99% target: 349 km/h / 217 mph-6.1 s
Calculated
42.5s99% target: 341 km/h / 212 mph-2.8 s
Calculated
45.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.4s-0.7 s
2.6s-0.5 s
2.8s-0.3 s
3.1s
0-200 km/h
6.0s-2.9 s
Calculated
6.8s-2.0 s
Calculated
7.4s-1.4 s
Calculated
8.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.3s-0.6 s
Calculated
2.5s-0.4 s
Calculated
2.7s-0.3 s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
9.3s-1.4 s
Calculated
9.7s-0.9 s
Calculated
10.1s-0.6 s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
457hp/t341kW/t207hp/1000 lb
Calculated
396hp/t295kW/t180hp/1000 lb
Calculated
359hp/t268kW/t163hp/1000 lb
Calculated
305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
545Nm/t365lb-ft/ton
Calculated
475Nm/t318lb-ft/ton
Calculated
429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton
Calculated
352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
617km383mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,670mm184in
4,670mm184in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
105mm4in
105mm4in
105mm4in
Trunk volume
315L
315L
315L
315L
Doors
2
2
2
2
Seats
4
4
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
74L
74L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 689 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 625 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 530 hpPowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 689 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 625 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 530 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp6,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp6,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp6,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp6,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.3 s
2.5 s
2.7 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.4 s
2.6 s
2.8 s
3.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
6.0 s
6.8 s
7.4 s
8.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
15.7 s
20.3 s
24.7 s
-
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
353 km/h
219 mph
344 km/h
214 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.8 s
1.8 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.2 s
4.4 s
4.5 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.2 s
6.5 s
6.7 s
7.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.9 s
8.3 s
8.5 s
9.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
9.3 s
9.7 s
10.1 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
260 km/h
162 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
795 hp
593 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
689 hp
514 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
625 hp
466 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
530 hp
395 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp has 265 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 530 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 530 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp: 265 hp (198 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
949 Nm
700 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
826 Nm
609 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
612 Nm
451 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
368 km/h
229 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
353 km/h
219 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
344 km/h
214 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp2.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp2.6 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp2.8 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp3.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 530 hp: 0.7 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 689 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 625 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
457 hp/t
341 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
396 hp/t
295 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
359 hp/t
268 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
617 km
383 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
617 km
383 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
617 km
383 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
617 km
383 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
795 hp
593 kW
2.4 s
368 km/h
229 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
689 hp
514 kW
2.6 s
353 km/h
219 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
625 hp
466 kW
2.8 s
344 km/h
214 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
530 hp
395 kW
3.1 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
Power
795 hp
593 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
Power
689 hp
514 kW
0-100 km/h2.6 s
Top speed
353 km/h
219 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
Power
625 hp
466 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
344 km/h
214 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
Power
795 hp
593 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
Power
689 hp
514 kW
0-100 km/h2.6 s
Top speed
353 km/h
219 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
Power
625 hp
466 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
344 km/h
214 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
2.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
2.6 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
2.8 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
3.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hp
457 hp/t
341 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hp
396 hp/t
295 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hp
359 hp/t
268 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)795 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)689 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)625 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6530 hp
Power
795 hp
593 kW
689 hp
514 kW
625 hp
466 kW
530 hp
395 kW
Torque
949 Nm
700 lb-ft
826 Nm
609 lb-ft
747 Nm
551 lb-ft
612 Nm
451 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.4 s
2.6 s
2.8 s
3.1 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
353 km/h
219 mph
344 km/h
214 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
617 km
383 mi
617 km
383 mi
617 km
383 mi
617 km
383 mi
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
457 hp/t
341 kW/t
2.2 kg/hp
396 hp/t
295 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
359 hp/t
268 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 689 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 625 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 530 hp
Consumption12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.00 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.80 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,150 LC/year3,150 LC/year3,150 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 795 hp

  • Has 106 hp more
  • Has 122 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
6.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Vantage6.0
3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12
3.8 V6
AMG C 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAudiR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
5.9 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinDBS V125.9 V12
3.8 V6
4.8 V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsLexusLFA4.8 V10
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAudiR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAudiR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
Tricolore 5.2
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 550-2Tricolore 5.2
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 3 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 2 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 1 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster