Car comparison

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI R8 Coupe (42)

5.2 FSI V10

525 hp5204 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2008-2010
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

530 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.1 s
  • Most powerful
    530 hp
    395 kW
  • Highest torque
    612 Nm
    451 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.3 L/100 km
    13.6 mpg US
    16.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10

  • Fastest top speed
    316 km/h
    196 mph
  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    323 hp/t
    241 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    647 km
    402 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
525hp391kW
530hp395kW
Torque
530Nm391lb-ft
612Nm451lb-ft
Curb weight
1,625kg3,583lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
1,925kg4,244lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
316 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
61.6s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
45.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
3.1s
0-200 km/h
11.4s
Calculated
8.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.7s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
323hp/t241kW/t147hp/1000 lb
Calculated
305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton
Calculated
352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
647km402mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,204cc318cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,434mm175in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,930mm76in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,252mm49in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,638mm64in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,595mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
100L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
90L
74L
CO2 emissions
326g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V108,000 rpm6,500 rpm8,250 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
3.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.4 s
8.8 s
Top speed
316 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
7.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
9.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.7 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
220 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
525 hp
391 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 has 5 hp more than AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
612 Nm
451 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
316 km/h
196 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V103.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V63.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
647 km
402 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
617 km
383 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
525 hp
391 kW
3.9 s
316 km/h
196 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW
3.1 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
316 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,434 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,252 mm
49.3 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
316 km/h
196 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
3.9 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
3.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
525 hp
391 kW
530 hp
395 kW
Torque
530 Nm
391 lb-ft
612 Nm
451 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
3.1 s
Top speed
316 km/h
196 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
100 L
3.5 cu ft
Length
4,434 mm
174.6 in
Height
1,252 mm
49.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
647 km
402 mi
617 km
383 mi
CO2 score
326 g/km
-
Trunk score
100 L
3.5 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
Consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.33 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.15 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,649 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10

  • Is 115 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 82 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 215 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
5.2 FSI V10
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)5.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
5.2 FSI V10
5.9 V12
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10vsAston MartinDBS V125.9 V12
3.8 V6
6.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Vantage6.0
5.2 FSI V10
Z06 7.0 i V8
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8
3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12
3.8 V6
AMG C 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
5.2 FSI V10
4.2 FSI V8
VS
AUDIR8 Coupe (42)5.2 FSI V10vsAUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)4.2 FSI V8
AUDI R8 Coupe (42) 5.2 FSI V10 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster