Car comparison

Lexus LFA 4.8 V10vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lexus LFA

4.8 V10

560 hp4805 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2010-2012
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

530 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.1 s
  • Highest torque
    612 Nm
    451 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.0 L/100 km
    19.6 mpg US
    23.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.3 L/100 km
    13.6 mpg US
    16.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    617 km
    383 mi
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Lexus LFA 4.8 V10

  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    325 km/h
    202 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    560 hp
    418 kW
  • Lightest
    1,590 kg
    3,505 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    352 hp/t
    263 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLexusLFA4.8 V10NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
560hp418kW
530hp395kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
612Nm451lb-ft
Curb weight
1,590kg3,505lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
1,755kg3,869lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
56.1s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
45.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.1s
0-200 km/h
10.0s
Calculated
8.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
372km231mi
Calculated
617km383mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,805cc293cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,505mm177in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,265mm50in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,605mm103in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
110mm4in
105mm4in
Trunk volume-
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
73L
74L
CO2 emissions
379g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lexus LFA 4.8 V10Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Lexus LFA 4.8 V10: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LexusLFA4.8 V108,700 rpm7,000 rpm9,000 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-6,000 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLexusLFA4.8 V10NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
38.6 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
9.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
214 km/h
133 mph
220 km/h
137 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
560 hp
418 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW

Lexus LFA 4.8 V10 has 30 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Lexus LFA 4.8 V10: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
612 Nm
451 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V103.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V63.1 s

Although Lexus LFA 4.8 V10 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Lexus LFA 4.8 V10: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
19.6 L/100 km
12.0 mpg US
14.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Lexus LFA 4.8 V10: 7.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusLFA4.8 V10
372 km
231 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
617 km
383 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LexusLFA4.8 V10
560 hp
418 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
530 hp
395 kW
3.1 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LexusLFA4.8 V10
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,265 mm
49.8 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LexusLFA4.8 V10
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
19.6 L/100 km
12.0 mpg US
14.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
530 hp
395 kW
0-100 km/h3.1 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LexusLFA4.8 V10
19.6 L/100 km
12.0 mpg US
14.4 mpg UK
3.7 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
3.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LexusLFA4.8 V10
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
19.6 L/100 km
12.0 mpg US
14.4 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLexusLFA4.8 V10NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
560 hp
418 kW
530 hp
395 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
612 Nm
451 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
325 km/h202 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
19.6 L/100 km
12.0 mpg US
14.4 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,265 mm
49.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
372 km
231 mi
617 km
383 mi
CO2 score
379 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
352 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
305 hp/t
227 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLexus LFA 4.8 V10Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
Consumption19.6 L/100 km12 mpg US14.4 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km34.30 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi55.20 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,940 L777 US gal647 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,145 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lexus LFA 4.8 V10

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Is 150 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Has 132 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 7.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 244 km (152 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lexus LFA 4.8 V10
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.8 V10
5.2i V10
VS
LexusLFA4.8 V10vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
4.8 V10
GT 5.2 V10
VS
LexusLFA4.8 V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)GT 5.2 V10
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
4.8 V10
6.2 V8
VS
LexusLFA4.8 V10vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)6.2 V8
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
4.8 V10
Tricolore 5.2
VS
LexusLFA4.8 V10vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 550-2Tricolore 5.2
3.8 V6
6.0
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Vantage6.0
4.8 V10
Superleggera 5.2
VS
LexusLFA4.8 V10vsLamborghiniGallardo LP 570-4Superleggera 5.2
3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinV12 Zagato6.0 V12
3.8 V6
AMG C 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
4.8 V10
5.2 FSI V10 plus
VS
LexusLFA4.8 V10vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
Lexus LFA 4.8 V10 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster