Nissan 370Z Roadster · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
Nissan 370Z Roadster · Facelift 2012 3.7 V6vsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,180 kg2,601 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful328 hp245 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 328hp245kW | 325hp242kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,180kg2,601lb |
| Gross weight | 1,885kg4,156lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.7s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 643km399mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,696cc226cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,250mm167in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,325mm52in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 7,400 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 328 hp 245 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW |
Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6 has 3 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 5.5 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
Although Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6 has more power, Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V and Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 643 km 399 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 325 hp 242 kW | 4.9 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan370Z RoadsterFacelift 20123.7 V6 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 328 hp 245 kW | 325 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,180 kg 2,601 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 643 km 399 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6 | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 370Z Roadster Facelift 2012 3.7 V6
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 97 km (61 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.2i 24V
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 62 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























