Volvo C70 Coupe
Car comparison
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V TurbovsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk403 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,410mm56in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 403L | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 5,700 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo has 25 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 7.5 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC70 Coupe2.0 20V Turbo | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 403 L 14.2 cu ft | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C70 Coupe 2.0 20V Turbo
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 96 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 100 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























