Car comparison

Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Toyota Celica (T23)

1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport

192 hp1796 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2000-2002
VS

Nissan 200 SX (S14)

2.0 i 16V Turbo

200 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe1993-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    225 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,215 kg
    2,679 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    365 L
  • Best overall score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
192hp143kW
200hp149kW
Torque
180Nm133lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,215kg2,679lb
1,350kg2,976lb
Gross weight
1,565kg3,450lb
1,780kg3,924lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
84.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
30.6s
Calculated
31.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
148Nm/t99lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
655km407mi
Calculated
739km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,796cc110cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,335mm171in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,735mm68in
1,730mm68in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,295mm51in
Wheelbase
2,600mm102in
2,525mm99in
Front track
1,490mm59in
1,480mm58in
Rear track
1,480mm58in
1,470mm58in
Trunk volume
365L
307L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-SportNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V TurboPowerTorque
  • Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport: Power / Torque
  • Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport7,800 rpm6,800 rpm8,050 rpm
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo6,400 rpm4,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.6 s
31.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
192 hp
143 kW
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
200 hp
149 kW

Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo has 8 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
180 Nm
133 lb-ft
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
1,215 kg
2,679 lb
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
1,350 kg
2,976 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport7.4 s
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo7.5 s

Although Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo has more power, Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
655 km
407 mi
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
739 km
459 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
4,335 mm
170.7 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
192 hp
143 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
180 Nm
133 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,215 kg
2,679 lb
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
4,335 mm
170.7 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Range score
655 km
407 mi
739 km
459 mi
Trunk score
365 L
12.9 cu ft
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-SportNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport

  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 58 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 85 Nm more
  • Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
2.0 Turbo
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsToyotaCelica (T20)2.0 Turbo
2.0 i 16V Turbo
328i
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsBMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
328Ci
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci
2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.0 V6 TB
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.5 20V T
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsVolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T
2.0 i 16V Turbo
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
330Cd
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Cd
2.0 i 16V Turbo
3.0 Turbo
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsNissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
1.8 T
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20001.8 T
2.0 i 16V Turbo
320 CE
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsMercedes-BenzC124Facelift 1989320 CE
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
3.0 V6
VS
ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-SportvsPeugeot406 Coupe (PHASE II)3.0 V6
2.0 i 16V Turbo
1.8 T
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport vs Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster