Car comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TBvsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo GTV (916)

2.0 V6 TB

202 hp1996 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1995-2003
VS

Nissan 200 SX (S14)

2.0 i 16V Turbo

200 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe1993-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

  • Lightest
    1,350 kg
    2,976 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    739 km
    459 mi
  • Largest trunk
    307 L
  • Best overall score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    47/100

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    202 hp
    151 kW
  • Highest torque
    271 Nm
    200 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
202hp151kW
200hp149kW
Torque
271Nm200lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,370kg3,020lb
1,350kg2,976lb
Gross weight
1,820kg4,012lb
1,780kg3,924lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
90.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
31.8s
Calculated
31.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
737km458mi
Calculated
739km459mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,996cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,285mm169in
4,560mm180in
Width
1,780mm70in
1,730mm68in
Height
1,318mm52in
1,295mm51in
Wheelbase
2,540mm100in
2,525mm99in
Front track
1,499mm59in
1,480mm58in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,470mm58in
Trunk volume
110L
307L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TBNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V TurboPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: Power / Torque
  • Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB6,000 rpm2,400 rpm6,250 rpm
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo6,400 rpm4,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.8 s
31.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
202 hp
151 kW
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
200 hp
149 kW

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB has 2 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
271 Nm
200 lb-ft
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
1,350 kg
2,976 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
235 km/h
146 mph
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB7.4 s
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo7.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
737 km
458 mi
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
739 km
459 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
202 hp
151 kW
7.4 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
7.4 s
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TB
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
271 Nm
200 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
1,350 kg
2,976 lb
Fuel consumption
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
110 L
3.9 cu ft
Length
4,285 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,318 mm
51.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Length
4,560 mm
179.5 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Range score
737 km
458 mi
739 km
459 mi
Trunk score
110 L
3.9 cu ft
307 L
10.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TBNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.63 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.76 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,494 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 6 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

  • Is 20 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 2 km (1 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 197 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 V6 TB
3.2 V6
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)Facelift 20033.2 V6
2.0 i 16V Turbo
328i
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsBMW3 Series Coupe (E36)328i
2.0 V6 TB
328Ci
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsBMW3 Series Coupe (E46)328Ci
2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.5 20V T
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsVolvoC70 Coupe2.5 20V T
2.0 V6 TB
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsNissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V Turbo
1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 VVTL-I T-Sport
2.0 i 16V Turbo
3.0 Turbo
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsNissan300 ZX (Z31)3.0 Turbo
2.0 i 16V Turbo
320 CE
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsMercedes-BenzC124Facelift 1989320 CE
2.0 V6 TB
1.8 T
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
2.0 V6 TB
3.0 V6 Zagato
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsAlfa RomeoSZ3.0 V6 Zagato
2.0 i 16V Turbo
3.0 V6
VS
Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V TurbovsAlfa RomeoGTV (916)3.0 V6
2.0 V6 TB
1.8 TBi
VS
Alfa RomeoGTV (916)2.0 V6 TBvsAlfa RomeoBrera1.8 TBi
Alfa Romeo GTV (916) 2.0 V6 TB vs Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster