Porsche 944 Cabrio
Car comparison
Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CATvsNissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 200 SX (S14)
2.0 i 16V Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CAT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 87.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 31.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,990cc182cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,560mm180in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,730mm68in |
| Height | 1,275mm50in | 1,295mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,525mm99in |
| Front track | - | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | - | 1,470mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 307L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CAT: Power / Torque
- Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 5,800 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 31.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 211 hp 157 kW |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CAT has 11 hp more than Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo and Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CAT: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 7.1 s |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CAT and Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche944 Cabrio3.0 S2 CAT | Nissan200 SX (S14)2.0 i 16V Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 307 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 944 Cabrio 3.0 S2 CAT
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan 200 SX (S14) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























