Car comparison
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD ElectricvsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Nismo 3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted313 km/h194 mph Restricted
- Most powerful1,360 hp1,014 kW
- Best power-to-weight784 hp/t585 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score94/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best overall score79/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,360hp1,014kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | - | 652Nm481lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 36.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 38.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.9s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 784hp/t585kW/t356hp/1000 lb Calculated | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,888mm192in | 4,690mm185in |
| Width | 2,230mm88in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,150mm45in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 29.0 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph Limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 239 km/h 149 mph | 229 km/h 143 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 1,360 hp 1,014 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW |
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric has 760 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric: 760 hp (567 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 2.7 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | 1,360 hp 1,014 kW | 2.7 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NIOEP9NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,360 hp 1,014 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 313 km/h194 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
NIO EP9 NIO EP9 (1360 Hp) 4WD Electric
- Has 760 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 436 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Is 10 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























