Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan I

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI

  • Lightest
    1,578 kg
    3,479 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    753 km
    468 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Power
202hp151kW
200hp149kW
Torque
303Nm223lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,578kg3,479lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,210kg4,872lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
79.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
39.0s
Calculated
37.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
753km468mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,427mm174in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,809mm71in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,686mm66in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,604mm103in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,570mm62in
Rear track
1,495mm59in
1,570mm62in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
402L
470L
Max trunk volume
1,705L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm5,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.0 s
37.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
1,578 kg
3,479 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
753 km
468 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,427 mm
174.3 in
Height
1,686 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Power
202 hp
151 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,578 kg
3,479 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,427 mm
174.3 in
Height
1,686 mm
66.4 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
753 km
468 mi
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 23 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 17 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 68 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
23d
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsBMWX1 (E84)23d
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo vs Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster