Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)
467 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 · Stage 2vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 · Stage 3vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 · Stage 1vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)
538 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
VS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)
424 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
VS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2) 467 hp
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.9 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions328 g/km
- Best estimated range387 km241 mi
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Most powerful538 hp402 kW
- Highest torque563 Nm415 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight345 hp/t257 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 467hp348kW+108 hp | 538hp402kW+179 hp | 424hp316kW+65 hp | 359hp268kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft+127 Nm | 563Nm415lb-ft+200 Nm | 443Nm327lb-ft+80 Nm | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph-4.6 s Calculated | 28.9s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-9.7 s Calculated | 34.2s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-4.4 s Calculated | 38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s-0.6 s | 3.2s-0.9 s | 3.7s-0.4 s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s-3.0 s Calculated | 8.1s-3.9 s Calculated | 10.3s-1.7 s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.1s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.6s-0.4 s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 10.5s-1.4 s Calculated | 11.4s-0.6 s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 345hp/t257kW/t157hp/1000 lb Calculated | 272hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 361Nm/t241lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 387km241mi Calculated | 387km241mi Calculated | 387km241mi Calculated | 387km241mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,505mm177in | 4,505mm177in | 4,505mm177in | 4,505mm177in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,810mm71in | 1,810mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,480mm58in | 1,480mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,650mm104in | 2,650mm104in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 135mm5in | 135mm5in | 135mm5in |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 328g/km | 328g/km | 328g/km | 328g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2) 467 hpMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hpMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1) 424 hpMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 359 hpPowerTorque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2) 467 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1) 424 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 359 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.1 s | 3.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.2 s | 3.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 8.1 s | 10.3 s | 12.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 4.8 s | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.0 s | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 8.9 s | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 10.5 s | 11.4 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 222 km/h 138 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 467 hp 348 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 538 hp 402 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 424 hp 316 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 359 hp 268 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp has 179 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 359 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 359 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp: 179 hp (134 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 563 Nm 415 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 443 Nm 327 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 359 hp: 0.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2) 467 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1) 424 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 272 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 387 km 241 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 387 km 241 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 387 km 241 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 387 km 241 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 467 hp 348 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 538 hp 402 kW | 3.2 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 424 hp 316 kW | 3.7 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 359 hp 268 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | 272 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2)467 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3)538 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1)424 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360359 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 467 hp 348 kW | 538 hp 402 kW | 424 hp 316 kW | 359 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 563 Nm 415 lb-ft | 443 Nm 327 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.2 s | 3.7 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 292 km/h 181 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 387 km 241 mi | 387 km 241 mi | 387 km 241 mi | 387 km 241 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 328 g/km | 328 g/km | 328 g/km | 328 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 272 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2) 467 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 1) 424 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 359 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.85 LC100 km | 24.85 LC100 km | 24.85 LC100 km | 24.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,728 LC/year | 3,728 LC/year | 3,728 LC/year | 3,728 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 2) 467 hp
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 (Stage 3) 538 hp
- Has 72 hp more
- Has 73 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)E 500 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsBMW5 Series Sedan (F10)550i V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDIS4 (B8)3.0 TFSI V6
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8