Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsLexus LS IV · Facelift 2009 460 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

359 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014
VS

Lexus LS IV · Facelift 2009

460 V8

381 hp4608 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8

  • Most powerful
    381 hp
    284 kW
  • Highest torque
    493 Nm
    364 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.5 L/100 km
    14.3 mpg US
    17.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    757 km
    470 mi
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    172 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
Power
359hp268kW
381hp284kW
Torque
363Nm268lb-ft
493Nm364lb-ft
Curb weight
1,560kg3,439lb
2,055kg4,530lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,495kg5,501lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
12.0s
Calculated
17.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
387km241mi
Calculated
757km470mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
4,608cc281cu in
Length
4,505mm177in
5,060mm199in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,875mm74in
Height
1,480mm58in
1,465mm58in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,970mm117in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,615mm64in
Rear track
1,545mm61in
1,620mm64in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
145mm6in
Trunk volume-
560L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
84L
CO2 emissions
328g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
  • Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3606,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V86,400 rpm4,100 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.0 s
17.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
200 km/h
124 mph
178 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
381 hp
284 kW

Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8 has 22 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8: 22 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
493 Nm
364 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
2,055 kg
4,530 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3604.1 s
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V85.7 s

Although Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
185 hp/t
138 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
387 km
241 mi
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
757 km
470 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
381 hp
284 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
Power
381 hp
284 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
5,060 mm
199.2 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
Power
381 hp
284 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
4.1 s
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
185 hp/t
138 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
Power
359 hp
268 kW
381 hp
284 kW
Torque
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
493 Nm
364 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
2,055 kg
4,530 lb
Fuel consumption
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
5,060 mm
199.2 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Range score
387 km
241 mi
757 km
470 mi
CO2 score
328 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
185 hp/t
138 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8
Consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.85 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.99 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,728 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Is 495 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8

  • Has 22 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 369 km (230 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Lexus LS IV 460 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
460 V8
460 V8
VS
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8vsLexusLS IV460 V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
460 V8
460 V8
VS
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
460 V8
430 V8
VS
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
460 V8
5.0 V8
VS
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
4.2 FSI V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsAUDIA8 (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
460 V8
4.2 FSI V8
VS
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)4.2 FSI V8
460 V8
5.0 V8
VS
LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
E 500 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)E 500 V8
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 vs Lexus LS IV · Facelift 2009 460 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster